It did not correspond to the note heard which was right. In fact with versions before v2.78, the display of the notes in the staff was sometimes wrong. It seems to me that it has always been so. In contrast, the capo on the 5th string has no effect on the pitch. On Wed, at 1:48 PM Matthieu Leschemelle wrote: Hi Rich, If you play a 12 on the first string with a capo at 2, you physically fret the 14th fret and get an E. Do you think this should also be done if there is no capo on the 5th string? Matthieu If it works, it might simplify the system and I could remove the "pegged" option. Your idea of counting the tab numbers from the main capo sounds interesting. And you can do it : - by changing the tuning - by using a pitch change effect - or by creating a custom tab instrument If you have a tef file that shows this problem, we could compare the result with the version 2 that you used to make your book. But there are always consequences to correcting a mistake that produced good results -) If you want the notes fretted on the 5th string to sound correctly, you have to increase the pitch by the value of the main capo. I fixed this problem with minimal consequences. It was easy to see in Instrument->Tuning: the tuning was not recognized. This was due to the fact that the 5th capo was corrupting the tuning of the banjo. Hi Rich, If you play a 12 on the first string with a capo at 2, you physically fret the 14th fret and get an E.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |